The Wenatchee World Online
Fugitive found after leaping from bridge
By Jaime Adame
World staff writer
Posted July 03, 2008

VALLEY HI — A daring escape by a woman who jumped from a bridge while handcuffed ended early this morning when she was taken into custody at a Valley Hi home.



Sandra I. Duffy, 43, jumped Tuesday night from the Sleepy Hollow Bridge north of Wenatchee into the water about 20 feet below.


She had agreed to arrange a drug deal for Columbia River Drug Task Force agents after being arrested earlier Tuesday. But instead of buying methamphetamine, she eluded searchers who never saw her surface from the water, said Lt. Jerry Moore of the Chelan County Sheriff's Office.


Moore said an anonymous tip called in at 1 a.m. today to RiverCom dispatchers led deputies to Duffy. She was found at a home in the 3100 block of Allen Lane in the Valley Hi community, about eight miles southwest of Peshastin and 23 miles from where she was last seen.


Moore said the sheriff's office is still investigating how Duffy made it to Valley Hi.


"She refused to talk to us, so we don't know," Moore said.


Residents of the home where she was found were not arrested, Moore said, adding that he didn't know what relationship they had with Duffy.


"We are going to be continuing this investigation to determine if anybody did help her get from point A to point B, knowing that she was wanted by police," said Moore.


Wednesday afternoon and evening, authorities received two separate reports from citizens who saw a barefoot woman early that morning about a mile east from where Duffy was last seen Tuesday, said Moore.


One man said he saw a handcuffed, shoeless woman wearing a long-sleeved men's shirt at about 6 a.m. in the 600 block of Lower Sunnyslope Road as he was working in an orchard.


Another man told authorities he spoke with a shoeless woman at about 6:15 a.m., and that the woman told him she was trying to avoid a violent boyfriend.


The man told authorities she was not wearing handcuffs when he spoke with her, Moore said.


Deputies began canvassing the area and knocking on doors and found some footprints in the area, said Moore.


At about 8 p.m., a bloodhound tracking dog was brought to the scene and found a trail that led through an irrigation ditch and to the side of the Wenatchee River Bridge nearest the confluence of the Wenatchee and Columbia rivers. The dog then lost the scent, said Moore.


The Wenatchee River Bridge is about two miles from the Sleepy Hollow Bridge and one mile from where the men reported seeing her.


At Valley Hi, deputies were given permission to enter the home and found a person on the couch hiding under a blanket. The woman gave a false name but eventually revealed herself to be Duffy, Moore said.


Duffy was arrested on suspicion of additional charges of second-degree escape, obstructing and misdemeanor theft for the clothes she was wearing, said Moore.


Jaime Adame: 664-7144


adame@wenworld.com



COMMENTS

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Register or Log in

 

"Rebecca, methamphetimines, heroine and many other drugs are not a one-time experimentation and done. The addictive qualities are so intense that these people chase the high at all cost"

That's funny, opioids and amphetimines are utilized for legitimate medical purposes all the time! By your logic every person who uses them legitimately is then an instant addict? I got very high dose opioids for anaesthesia when I had my tonsillectomy and didn't wake up a heroin fiend.

"Rebecca, I'm not going to spend time constructing a tome of refutation which deconstructs and refutes the points you make in an attempt to support your opinion."

You can't. What you posted is pure Argument Ad Populum, and has no logical merit.

"I'd much rather pay for their meals in prison while they're not breaking the law than pay for them to get therapy hugs and hope they don't kill someone in a drug deal gone wrong between hugs"

If substances were legalized there would be no drug deals.
Rebecca Jones | Jul 18, 2008 9:13 pm | Request Removal
Well said Martin. Rather than get into the endless discussion, the fact is, the law was broken multiple times. And, for now, this is still the law and the law needs to be enforced. So, put these people behind bars. I'd much rather pay for their meals in prison while they're not breaking the law than pay for them to get therapy hugs and hope they don't kill someone in a drug deal gone wrong between hugs.
enviro dude | Jul 4, 2008 3:11 pm | Request Removal
Rebecca, I'm not going to spend time constructing a tome of refutation which deconstructs and refutes the points you make in an attempt to support your opinion. That would be absolutely futile; the same futility experienced when trying to have a rational discussion with peace activists about the war in Iraq. My opinion still stands: use whatever is needed to catch the mopes and put them in prison.
Martin Reginald | Jul 4, 2008 11:10 am | Request Removal
Rebecca, methamphetimines, heroine and many other drugs are not a one-time experimentation and done. The addictive qualities are so intense that these people chase the high at all cost (i.e. creating victims through theft, burglary, and assault.)
Pot smokers, for years, have been touting the merits of legalization, but I haven't heard anyone make a case for across the board drug legalization.
Regarding the sex-offender issue, you never made any reference to the victims. You were stating how ineffective our legal system was with it's prosececution and punishment of the convicted. I was just curious how you would handle another one of the justice systems apparent failings.
Don Ribbs | Jul 4, 2008 10:31 am | Request Removal
"Rebecca, ...and your feelings on prostitution?"

IMO that should be legal and controlled as well, as it already is in Nevada.

I'm not going to address the sex-offender question, you know as well as I that isn't a victimless crime, and the comparison makes you sound like your question is rhetoric only. Prostitution and drug use involve consent by all parties and those people are generally content to hurt just themselves.

Since you and "none none" obviously do not think decriminalization is a good idea do you think alcohol should again be prohibited? With the amount of DWI's we have and the fact that alcohol is involved in a vast percentage of other crime, it would make sense to ban that as well as long as we want to legislate a moral compass for others. Alcohol impairs people to the point that they have no control and absolutely destroys lives of abusers and families that live with an abuser. Do you think that would change if it was criminalized?

If not, why the double standard? Mind altering substances (including alcohol) are all comparable. There are those who abuse and will always be.

Can you tell me why bringing back prohibition of alcohol is a bad idea?
Rebecca Jones | Jul 4, 2008 10:00 am | Request Removal
probaly should throw marriage out as there are so many divorces too. And people seem to lie, cheat and steal, why not make that legal? who needs rules and a guidebook to live by anyway?
None None | Jul 4, 2008 8:18 am | Request Removal
Rebecca, ...and your feelings on prostitution? While your at it, how should they handle sex-offenders? Prison seems to have no effect on those guys either. I really am curious what your opinions on these issues are, because to me they have a lot of the same arguments you stated about "the war on drugs".
Don Ribbs | Jul 4, 2008 1:57 am | Request Removal
"Rebecca, That's the problem. What's the solution?"

The solution is controlled legalization, the same as the solution to alcohol prohibition was. My reasoning?

People will buy and use whether a substance is illegal or not.

Recidivism rates are extremely high after incarceration, incarceration *does not* work as a deterrant.

Legalizing currently illegal substances will lead to safer products, more jobs, and massive revenues for the government, just as legalization and government control of alcohol did.

It will stop the flow of illegal drugs from beyond our borders almost immediately.

Drug related street crime will plummet.

I'm sure there are many other reasons. Other countries have gone the route of legalization and control and have had very positive results.

We *KNOW* from history's model that prohibition does not work. Given the fact that people will seek out mind altering substances no matter what, the *only* effective solution is legalization. You cannot stop people from getting high- whether it is cigarettes, coffee, alcohol, prescription or currently illegal street drugs. They even seek out and obtain drugs *in prison*!

Yes, you will have problems with drug abuse after legalization, *just as we do with alcohol*, but abuse of illegal substances is already so common that legalization will make no perceptible difference. Some of the revenues could even be funneled into treatment programs which are far more effective than incarceration.

Just my 2cents.
Rebecca Jones | Jul 4, 2008 12:43 am | Request Removal
Rebecca, That's the problem. What's the solution?
Don Ribbs | Jul 3, 2008 10:41 pm | Request Removal
"Sure, Rebecca, doing a controlled buy to catch the mopes is a great idea in any location."

I respect your opinions and I most definitely disagree this time.

She can join the other 250,000ish state prison inmates who are there for non-violent drug offenses at an outrageous cost to the taxpayers of this nation.

"According to the American Corrections Association, the average daily cost per state prison inmate per day in the US is $67.55. State prisons held 249,400 inmates for drug offenses in 2006. That means it cost states approximately $16,846,970 per day to imprison drug offenders, or $6,149,144,050 per year.

Sources: American Correctional Association, 2006 Directory of Adult and Juvenile Correctional Departments, Institutions, Agencies and Probation and Parole Authorities, 67th Edition (Alexandria, VA: ACA, 2006), p. 16; Sabol, William J., PhD, Couture, Heather, and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, December 2007)"

This doesn't calculate the cost of investigations and trials- our system is broken, and law enforcement is wasting time trying to plug a leak in the dam when the water is flowing right over the edge.

Not to mention prison does *nothing* to rehabilitate these people and the threat of prison is doing nothing to stem the abuse of illegal substances in this nation. Margaret, she will not get the help she desperately needs there, but instead will learn to be a more effective criminal.

Prohibition didn't work, the "war on drugs" isn't working. There is a better way.
Rebecca Jones | Jul 3, 2008 10:15 pm | Request Removal
She was found, Margaret. She had jumped in an attempted escape. Now she faces additional charges.
Martin Reginald | Jul 3, 2008 9:35 pm | Request Removal
Sandra among other drug addicts live in a world of despair and decent. Can the police trust her? Can the drug dealer trust her? Can she trust herself, I am shocked anyone would jump off the bridge 20 feet down, not to bright. I do not like to see anyone hurt, but to me it sounds like she did not care if she lived or died. Sandra also put our officers in danger. I hope she is ok when found and gets some help for her addiction and mental health problems. I feel really sorry for her family. I wonder what they have had to deal with in the past
Margaret Matthew | Jul 3, 2008 7:20 pm | Request Removal
Sure, Rebecca, doing a controlled buy to catch the mopes is a great idea in any location.
Martin Reginald | Jul 3, 2008 6:48 pm | Request Removal
Who in the heck in our drug task force thinks it's a good idea to do a controlled buy on a *bridge*???

Laying aside the whole fact that the war on drugs is an abysmal failure and waste of money and time, is it really necessary to do buys on top of public structures?
Rebecca Jones | Jul 3, 2008 5:16 pm | Request Removal
Sounds like Sandra could use a long vacation in Walla Walla.
enviro dude | Jul 3, 2008 3:09 pm | Request Removal
POST A COMMENT (limit 5,000 characters)
   

Some readers using Firefox 3 for their browser have had problems posting comments. Until this is resolved, please use an alternate browser if you are experiencing this problem.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© The World Publishing Company


Send a news tip
Place a classified ad
Publish your photos
Add an event to the calendar
Subscribe to The World