The Wenatchee World

Weather:

Weather

The latest extended forecast from The Weather Channel

Remove this weather forecast

Tonight

Lo59° Clear

Saturday

Hi88° Sunny

Saturday Night

Lo61° Clear

Sunday

Hi93° Sunny

Sunday Night

Lo66° Mostly Clear

Monday

Hi96° Hot

Monday Night

Lo66° Clear

Tuesday

Hi100° Hot

Tuesday Night

Lo66° Clear

Wednesday

Hi101° Hot

So, why wouldn't we expand hospice?

Send to Kindle
Print This

I've been meaning all week to get back to my blog, and this morning, this story came across my inbox that prompted me to finally write again.

It's a story through the Kaiser Family Foundation, which regularly sends me news. After having my first personal experience with Hospice when my mother died in March, this article was an eye-opener for me.

I guess what I didn't realize about hospice is that the patient has to forgo what they call "curative" treatments, such as chemotherapy. I didn't know that. I thought to qualify, a patient had to be basically diagnosed with less than six months to live, but I didn't realize it only comes into play once a patient opts to reject certain treatments.

This article says that even though it was required under the new Affordable Care Act, Medicare hasn't started experimenting with an expansion of hospice services to patients who don't reject those treatments. The idea is, even if they continue to try chemotherapy or other measures, hospice can still be a cheaper and better quality option for some.

As the article points out, "It's not clear whether allowing Medicare recipients to receive curative and palliative treatments at the same time would save money."

Apparently insurance companies think it would — some are offering to pay any extra costs for their elderly enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans.

I certainly hope the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services gets rolling on this trial soon. According to their own statement, "This demonstration would allow beneficiaries to receive both palliative and curative care at the same time, which could provide better overall care to the patient."

In short, it means that more people would be able to get care at home at the end of their life, whether or not the reject certain treatments. To me, it's simply the humane thing to do.

All comments are moderated before appearing. For more information, please read the approval guidelines. Questions? See our Disqus commenting FAQ or our full commenting policy.

Comments Help

A few important points:

  • You must have a Disqus account to comment (your Wenatchee World login and Disqus login are completely separate)
  • You must provide your first and last name
  • Your comment must be civil

For more information see our Disqus commenting FAQ or our full commenting policy