County officials mapping out budget cuts

  • Post a comment
  • Print
  • Bookmark and Share

WENATCHEE — Chelan County officials on Tuesday began the grim task of deciding how many people to lay off to cut spending next year.

Commissioners adopted a preliminary 2010 budget with $2 million in cuts.

Each department has been given a target amount they have to trim, ranging from a low of $513 for the Board of Equalization to a high of $460,700 for the Sheriff’s Office.

Departments have until Dec. 1 to decide how they will reach it.

County Administrator Cathy Mulhall said she expects about 20 people to lose their jobs as a result of the reductions. Earlier estimates were as high as 50 people.

The county is facing about a $2 million drop in revenues, particularly sales tax, building permits and treasury interest, from what was projected in 2009. Additionally, the commissioners are trying to increase the fund balance, or money on hand to cover its operating expenses.

Commissioners initially talked about cutting 10 percent — or $3.2 million — across all departments from next year’s budget. That could have forced layoffs of 50 employees. They have since adjusted that down to $2.1 million. They also made bigger cuts in some departments and smaller ones in other departments, placing a priority on public safety.

Officials were unusually quiet as commissioners doled out the cuts Tuesday morning.

“The screaming and hollering has already occurred,” said acting Auditor Skip Moore. “It’s obvious to everyone that the county is in a hole and this had to happen.”

Moore said he will have to lay off one person and possibly reduce another person to part time to reach his cut of $68,399.

However, if he is chosen by commissioners to replace Auditor Evelyn Arnold next month, Moore said he will not refill his deputy auditor position and will not have to lay anyone off.

Prosecutor Gary Riesen, who already laid off a prosecutor during budget cuts this year, said he will have to lay off at least one more person and possibly more. He said he will first explore the idea of reducing hours for his staff to save money.

“But I don’t have enough money in my budget to make the cut without affecting personnel,” he added.

Riesen said that out of his $1.7 million annual budget, only about $80,000 is not tied to salaries and benefits. He has been asked to cut nearly $108,000 next year.

Juvenile Services Director Phil Jans said he also will look into the idea of reducing hours and salaries, but that would have to be approved by the employees and their unions. Without that, he would have to lay off a few people to reach his $177,500 cut. He said his employees earn between about $45,000 and $60,000 a year.

“The amount is so big that there is no way other than reducing salaries,” he added. “You can’t get that out of (cutting) pencils and copy paper.”

Jans already laid off two Juvenile Services employees during this year’s budget cuts.

Last week, Sheriff Mike Harum said he would have to lay off six deputies if he had to slash his spending by 10 percent — the commissioners’ original goal.

His cut was reduced to 5.8 percent, or just under $461,000.

Since his budget is the largest in the county’s general fund, he is being asked to reduce the most.

On Tuesday, Harum said he expects to lay off one administrative person who works in the office.

He will also lay off a deputy who was already laid off this year, but then hired back full time on an hourly basis without benefits.

Harum said he will eliminate five vacant deputy positions from his budget, but will not lay off any other working deputies.

To round out the cuts, he will reduce spending on supplies, equipment and overtime.

“We’re just hoping nothing big happens next year,” he said. “A big fire or flood would easily put us in the hole.”

County commissioners are imposing the cuts because of revenue shortfalls.

All departments made two cuts in 2009 that amounted to about 5 percent of their overall spending.

In all, the equivalent of 22 positions were lost, either through layoffs, moving people to part time or not filling vacancies.

Michelle McNiel: 664-7152

mcniel@wenatcheeworld.com

Comments

Want to comment on this story? Registered users can use the form below. Please know that we at wenatcheeworld.com hope our site is useful, entertaining and civil. So we'll delete comments that are obscene, abusive or way off topic. We appreciate it when readers use the "suggest removal" button to flag inappropriate comments. For more about interacting with the site, see our Use Policy.

NOTaHOMER (Tim L) says...

Seems to me the Sheriff's Office spends a large amount of money on search and rescue of non-county citizens (ie: west siders) who get lost, stranded, injured or otherwise need assistance in the Chelan County section of the mountains. I have been told State law mandates county sheriff's offices have search and rescue. But, can they not charge for the rescue especially if it was negligence of the party being rescued to cause the rescue. Maybe Tim Eiman should start an initiative for this. Other states, I believe Colorado, sell insurance on hunting licenses for rescues. This may save, through reimbursement, the counties some dollars (and charge the select few people who get that service). Just a thought.

November 4, 2009 at 3:28 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

BeenThere (John Smith) says...

So, you want hunters to pay for all the County Search and Rescue??? Maybe they should require hikers, bird watchers, horseback riders, bike riders and everyone else who steps of the pavement buy a license to do so to fund the S&R! The majority of S&R are not for hunters. Better yet, why doesn't the State pay for their mandates?

November 4, 2009 at 9:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

NOTaHOMER (Tim L) says...

I didn't say I want hunters to pay for all search and rescues. I was giving that as a suggestion and a place for someone to start research. You read too much into the post and then have an argumentative response. I think anyone who goes out and requires rescue due to their negligence or other issue they created; ie: drugs, alcohol, not trained or properly equipped, should bare some of the burden of the associated costs.

November 5, 2009 at 5:20 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

BeenThere (John Smith) says...

" I think anyone who goes out and requires rescue due to their negligence or other issue they created; ie: drugs, alcohol, not trained or properly equipped, should bare some of the burden of the associated costs."
 
I believe they tried that a few years back and either found the cost associated with collecting the $$ was more than they collected or someone file a lawsuit citing the "mandate" and won.
 
I still feel if the State mandates it, they should reimburse the County.

November 5, 2009 at 7:47 a.m. ( | suggest removal )

FEATURED ON WENATCHEEWORLD.COM

Phone: 509.663.5161

Copyright © 2009 World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Use Policy