Safety Valve: Letters from readers

  • Post a comment
  • Print
  • Bookmark and Share

Thoughts from a Scouter’s wife

My husband, Gene, had a Scoutmaster in St. Louis who believed in seeing that his boys maintain their membership in the troop while in college or the service so they could help with the troop in the summertime.

There was such a bond between these Scouts that one of them, who became a Methodist minister, gathered together about 12 original Scouts, eight years ago, for a periodic reunion. They celebrated the anniversary of the Lewis and Clark expedition by camping at the campsite where Lewis and Clark began their trip.

Gene was awarded his 65-year pin in 2002.

Our first home with Alcoa was in Maryville, Tenn., followed by Port Lavaca, Texas; Massena, N.Y.; Vancouver and finally Wenatchee.

Of all the BSA Councils where Gene was a “volunteer”, this is the only district which has a Scout camp that is easily accessible.

Gene, for 31 years of his life, helped with training courses in the Council as well as the as well as the Northwest Area and the Western Region. His most enjoyable times were helping at Scout-A-Vista with: Cub Scout Day Camp; Webelos Resident Camp; Junior Leader Training; Brown Sea Camp and Adult Wood Badge Training.

Our thanks to all the dedicated Scouters and God bless the boys who deserve the very best in training and fun they can have at Scout-A-Vista. Please help us keep it.

Norma Vanderheyden

Wenatchee

Don’t blame unions

Tracy Warner’s editorial and Mike Sprague’s letter to the Safety Valve Nov. 3 seemed harsh and both missed the point. Mr. Sprague is absolutely correct that everyone should be paid for their services, but there are certain services which, if prohibitively high, interfere with our ability to fulfill our right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Although Canada and Great Britain have some problems with their health care systems, they are still cheaper and have better long-term outcomes than our health care. There are plenty of other government-run health care systems in the world that can run circles around our private care.

Please Tracy, Boeing has been a different company since the McDonald Douglas buyout. Former and present employees know Boeing used to be a great place to work; employees took pride in the product they produced. Boeing has always had its ups and downs but the primary concern was always to make a quality product, then take good care of their customers. Now there is a feeling that the only important thing is the bottom line.

We all know what is bad about unions — too big, too demanding, etc. But before we get rid of the bums, let’s remember who helped workers get health care, the 40-hour work week, paid vacations, retirement benefits, overtime, etc. Companies are not tethered to communities that helped make them great — good schools, a mild climate or loyalty are not important — the bottom line is the big deal. One can only hope this isn’t the mother of all bad decisions made by a company that hasn’t been able to manage its way to an on-time finish and delivery of the 787. Maybe everyone can move south, work with no benefits, no security, and no money to fly anywhere.

Connie Fliegel

Quincy

Justifier of the unjust

Earlier this year the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) tried to force Wenatchee libraries to unlock their computers, which could have left them open to misuse by minors. Why would the ACLU care about Wenatchee library computers? Because someone wanted to go to pro-gun Web sites and the library, by locking their computers, took away that person’s civil right to do so. What galls me about this is the ACLU is well known to be anti-gun and pro gun control. Does anyone besides me see the hypocrisy in this?

A more recent project of the ACLU is trying to get a cross removed from a lonely stretch of Arizona highway. The group, which boasts to be a purveyor of religious freedom, is constantly embroiled in removing Christian symbols somewhere across this nation. Once again: hypocrisy.

The bottom line is that the ACLU doesn’t really stand for anything except to take the side of the underdog even if said underdog is a moral and societal reprobate. All you card-carrying members, did you know that your dues went to represent the rights of homosexual pedophiles? Did you know that when the ACLU sues your government on behalf of some aliens that our law-keepers were trying to deport, win or lose, we pay the legal fees out of our tax dollars?

Under the guise of “church/state separation,” the ACLU has picked up the cause of all frustrated atheists to get the Bible removed from schools and the Ten Commandments removed from public buildings. Under the guise of “defending the downtrodden,” the ACLU has become the justifier of the unjust, protector of the perpetrator and quite possibly the most amoral institution in this country. They give voice to those who would morally, socially, politically and civilly undermine this nation and its values.

Tim Lamb

Ephrata

We are sheep

As the saying goes, “Behold, I send you out as sheep amidst the wolves.”

Well, all of the sheep who were for Obama are in the wolf den now. He is bankrupting the economy, and little by little, is selling off pieces of U.S. businesses. He is raising taxes soon, while taking away our rights.

It’s time to get him out of office and bring back jobs. Also, get the troops out of the Middle East, and let the people there kill themselves off.

Gary Coffey

Orondo

Letters policy

All letters must include the author’s signature, address and telephone number. There is a 300-word limit, and all letters are subject to editing.

Only one letter per author will be published each 30 days.

Send letters to The Safety Valve, Box 1511, Wenatchee, WA 98807.

Fax letters to 665-1183, e-mail to Newsroom@wenworld.com, or use the form at www.wenatcheeworld.com.

Comments

Want to comment on this story? Registered users can use the form below. Please know that we at wenatcheeworld.com hope our site is useful, entertaining and civil. So we'll delete comments that are obscene, abusive or way off topic. We appreciate it when readers use the "suggest removal" button to flag inappropriate comments. For more about interacting with the site, see our Use Policy.

Looker (I Am Looker) says...

Re: Justifier of the Unjust

It appears incorrect to claim the suit is specifically about NCRL Internet filters having prevented someone from accessing *pro-gun web sites*. As this link -- http://www.aclu.org/files/pdfs/freesp... -- seems clearly to indicate, the suit is about potential violation of the 1st amendment.

Further, the writer provides no example to support his claim that the ACLU is anti-gun. This ACLU web link -- http://www.aclu.org/racial-justice_pr... -- in fact, suggests otherwise, including the ACLU statement that "neither the possession of guns nor the regulation of guns raises a civil liberties issue."

The Constitution requires a balance between free speech and the potential harm some speech can do (to children, for instance). There will probably always be a tension in this regard. The ACLU, the courts and other parties to the case must work it out, and so they are. Why try to "kill the messenger?" Have the writer no confidence the courts will rightly decide?

The writer sees hypocrisy in the ACLU's position on the cross on a "lonely stretch of Arizona highway since, the writer claims, the ACLU "boasts to be a purveyor of religious freedom. Hypocrisy? If only the world were so simple.

The Constitution requires a balance between freedom of religion and government endorsement of religion. There will probably always be a tension in this regard. The ACLU, the courts and other parties to the case must work it out, and so they are. Why try to "kill the messenger?" Have you no confidence the courts will rightly decide?

Note that the most recent ACLU newsletter -- volume 41,#2 -- contains an example of the ACLU defending religious freedom and why.

Contrary to the writer's claim that "the ACLU doesn't really stand for anything except to take the side of the underdog" the ACLU exists to defend the U.S. Constitution and anything the ACLU recognizes as erosion of Constitutionally mandated rights. The writer cites a few general examples of his grievances and makes the claim that tax payers pay the legal fees, win or lose. Unfortunately he fails to cite specifics to support his general claims.

Regrettable that his final sentence implies a fairly robust contempt for the US Constitution and for those, including the ACLU and our courts, who would defend it.

I wonder what the writer's comments are regarding the courts that often side with the ACLU's position regarding Constitutional conflicts. Where will he turn when even the courts disagree with him?

So many generalized claims in the Safety Valve. Would that people would choose one example and discuss that more fully in their 300 word Safety Valve letter rather than shotgun a load of unsupported generalizations at their readership.

May the gods grant the readership a critical mind.

November 16, 2009 at 6:26 p.m. ( | suggest removal )

FEATURED ON WENATCHEEWORLD.COM

Phone: 509.663.5161

Copyright © 2009 World Publishing Co. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use   |   Privacy Policy   |   Use Policy