State braces for climate change
Wednesday, November 25, 2009
If you go
What: Climate change meeting
When: 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. Dec. 10
Where: Wenatchee Public Library, 310 Douglas St., Wenatchee
WENATCHEE — Officials from several state agencies will gather in Wenatchee early next month to ask people here how the state should prepare for climate change.
“Significant impacts are projected in some sectors as early as the 2020s and certainly by the 2040s — these are not ‘far in the future’ impacts,” according to an executive summary in the Climate Impacts Group’s impacts assessment, released this summer.
A warmer climate will affect everything from snowpack in the mountains, to sea levels on the coast, the report says.
Scientists say temperature records show that the Pacific Northwest has warmed about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit since 1920. That warming is predicted to hasten, with latest models from the University of Washington’s Climate Impacts Group showing that in another 10 years the average temperature will be 2 degrees warmer, and in 70 years, it will be more than 5 degrees warmer.
To prepare for these impacts, the state Legislature directed several state agencies to develop a strategy by December 2011.
The state departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Ecology, Fish and Wildlife, Natural Resources and Transportation are being asked to come up with ways to address or adapt to the effects of a warmer climate.
Seth Preston, spokesman for the state Department of Ecology, said impacts will vary in different locations of the state. In North Central Washington, water supply will be a critical aspect of climate change, and could have major impacts on farmers, power production, and fish habitat.
A smaller snowpack could also leave the region with drier forests, which could result in larger or more severe wildfires, he noted.
“What happens if there’s less runoff, and not only less, but it’s happening at different times of the year than it has historically?” he asked.
“Those are the kinds of things that people need to be looking around and asking, ‘If these things start happening, what can be done?’”
Among the impacts predicted throughout the Pacific Northwest by the Climate Impacts Group:
• April 1 snowpack will drop by almost one-third across the state by the 2020s, and more than one-half by the 2040s.
• The quality of habitat for salmon will be reduced, particularly in the interior Columbia River Basin and Lake Washington Ship Canal.
• The area burned by wildfires will double by the 2040s, and triple by the 2080s, increasing to more than 2 million acres in a given year.
• Significantly more heat and air pollution-related deaths will occur throughout the century. The group predicts 101 additional deaths among people over 45 years old by 2025 in the Seattle area alone.
The state is asking local agencies, businesses, farmers and residents to help them develop a strategy to prepare for these changes. One of two meetings to gather suggestions is in Wenatchee on Dec. 10, and all are welcome to attend.
K.C. Mehaffey: 997-2512
mehaffey@wenatcheeworld.com
» 41 comments on this story
MORE LIKE THIS
State would see dramatic impacts from climate change
Climate change cutting Cascade snowpack
Warmer climate melts rules for dam operators
Fire forecasters expect average season in NCW
Study -- Warming already affecting state: Tourism, dairy and wine industries likely economic victims
Advertisement
UPCOMING EVENTS
Tuesday, May 21
Toastmasters
Chelan County PUD Auditorium, 327 N. Wenatchee Ave., 7 a.m.
Tuesday, May 21
Alzheimer's Association Caregiver Support Group
Lake Chelan Community Hospital, 1:30 p.m.
Tuesday, May 21
Alzheimer's Association Caregiver Support Group
Lake Chelan Community Hospital, 1:30 p.m.
Tuesday, May 21
Memory Lane Coffee Hour
Mountain Meadows Assisited Living, 2:30 p.m.




Comments
Want to comment on this story? All Wenatchee World members are invited to comment on stories, by using the form below. Please know that we at wenatcheeworld.com hope our site is useful, entertaining and civil. So we'll delete comments that are obscene, abusive or way off topic. We appreciate it when readers use the "suggest removal" button to flag inappropriate comments. For more about interacting with the site, see our Use Policy.
3 years, 5 months ago
The science of assumption demands the substance of your faith. Barring that, all one hears is hideous laughter in the background. And..here...we......GO!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSLlZh...
paintguy 3 years, 5 months ago
Here we go.........someone's paranoid ideas getting the best of them.
3 years, 5 months ago
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
"In other words, Mr. Roberson from the Sierra Club does not want the very thing removed from the forest that might help prevent the potential risk for forest fire" . Surely as an orchardist, you must know enough about soils to understand that they must be replenished.
DrJones 3 years, 5 months ago
Wrong. http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=Climategate&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&oq=&fp=25d2df88517031cf
seidy68 3 years, 5 months ago
What a load of marxist crap. Tell the parasites in these do-gooder ministries to shut up to cut down on "greenhouse" CO2 and water vapor. Then fire them. Tell them what the Russians told the soviet slavemasters in 1991 at the fall of the USSR: "tell the ministries to catch mice. If they dont catch mice, then they dont eat."
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
Words have meanings, Greg. This has nothing to do with marxism. . Dr Jones, your link doesn't work.
Tim 3 years, 5 months ago
1.5 degrees in 89 years doesn't prove a thing.
Actually, I keep hearing how we will run out of petrolium in thirty years anyway...PROBLEM SOLVED! YEA!!!
Somebody put a cork in Yellowstone, it's destroying the O-zone. :>)
I want to get in the act. I want to help. Send your donations to: "Change Tim's World" Entiat USA/Earth And give him a cooler place to live. Obama promised change, what's everyone so upset about?
Everyone have a 1.5 degree warmer Turkey day!
Tim
3 years, 5 months ago
3 years, 5 months ago
DrJones Vince, is that you?
3 years, 5 months ago
Okay, I think this is DrJones' link: http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ed-begley-and-stuart-varney-argue-climategate-on-fox-news/
seidy68 3 years, 5 months ago
Norm, the marxists are now the pushers of the international "green" agenda. Slavery by another name. Go research Gorbachev, he is a big "green" leader now. Green is the new RED. I am anti-green.
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
Gorbachev ended Marxism in the Soviet Union. Try again.
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
C'mon mav, haven't you ever built a compost pile? You know you've got to balance the nitrogen with carbon - add straw to the manure.
3 years, 5 months ago
Cellulose doesn't contribute anything to the compost, Norm. Leaves do, but not the wood. Grass clippings do, but not the wood. Green manures are excellent, but not the wood. Banana peels, kitchen wastes are all good, but not the wood. Wood in compost will not degrade quickly or easily. It's a non-essential fiber. Better to make a biofuel out of it and reduce the potential risk of forest fire.
3 years, 5 months ago
This is a work in progress: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climatic...
artmann 3 years, 5 months ago
Why in the World.....would you print this garbage? This article is forecasting doom and gloom 20 - 30 years from now and the weatherman can't even predict tomorrow's weather accurately. Have you heard of the Hadley break-in. The researchers are caught in emails confused on the cooling of the last ten years. Liberal marxism exposed!!!
artmann 3 years, 5 months ago
Great article here about Hadley by a Hydrological engineering scientist. One quote "Finally, the CRU hackers should be given the Nobel Peace Prize" is right on. . http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=299968&t=01000860093551905860
3 years, 5 months ago
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/arti...
3 years, 5 months ago
Oops, looks like links cannot be copied and pasted from post to post. Apparently the article URL must be copied and pasted separately each time from the address bar for each individual post. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/11/25/the_skeptics_are_vindicated_99296.html
artmann 3 years, 5 months ago
We have been so scammed!!! "This shows that scientists “artificially adjusted” temperature data to hide the decline in temperatures after 1960. The graphs cited by global warming advocates to argue for continued man-made global warming in the modern era are therefore largely fraudulent. This is not about “rancor,” “debate” or “insults,” as the media spin machine would frame it, this is about hardcore evidence of deliberate deception." http://www.prisonplanet.com/forget-the-emails-code-discusses-artificially-adjusted-temperatures.html
Chuck 3 years, 5 months ago
And what of the emails hacked from the University of Anglia's Climate Reserach Unit? http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=18712&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=DPD
This pretty much proves that the "source" data on anthropogenic global warming is fatally flawed--and yet our leaders are INSISTING we surrender our sovereignty, our liberty, and perhaps even our very lives for this momumental non-sequiter.
Chuck 3 years, 5 months ago
Why isn't the World reporting on the current "climategate" shttp://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100018034/climategate-%20%20e-mails-sweep-america-may-scuttle-barack-obamas-cap-and-trade-laws/candal? are they too busy trying to become palatable to Seattle society to actually look into an issue? For an interesting perspective on how the leaked emails in my previous post are affecting the entire planet in a more reasonable, rational way, click on the following link:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100018034/climategate-%20%20e-mails-sweep-america-may-scuttle-barack-obamas-cap-and-trade-laws/
robbins 3 years, 5 months ago
"Why isn't the World reporting on the current "climategate" scandal? are they too busy trying to become palatable to Seattle society to actually look into an issue?"
Hackers steal data from top climate research center by By Juliet Eilperin, The Washington Post
Chuck 3 years, 5 months ago
One weak Washington Post reprint that covers none of the actual numbers, and instead refers to one email about threatening to "beat up" one skeptic. Have you read through these emails? Looked at the math? Was it hackers or a whistle-blower? There is much more to this than a cursory glance, and no mention of it in the article to which this thread is dedicated. Maybe Mehaffey could have at LEAST questioned the validity of holding such state-wide meetings in light of the reams of previously witheld information we need to fully understand before making life-altering decisions on a legislative level. On the Climategate story the climate alarmists have been eerily silent while contiuning to march to the same tired drum and I personally find that, well, alarming.
Tim 3 years, 5 months ago
"That warming is predicted to hasten, with latest models from the University of Washington’s Climate Impacts Group showing that in another 10 years the average temperature will be 2 degrees warmer, and in 70 years, it will be more than 5 degrees warmer." Here is the biggest missleading part of the equasion. Their "predicitons" are held up as fact and used to scare people into submission. Because they can say with some "evidence" that the average temp is 1.5 degrees higher than 90 years ago does not give them any grounds for predictions. I could just as easily predict that the trend will be to cool off because THAT is the historical record of weather patterns, cycling.
3 years, 5 months ago
The University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit's official response: https://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/2009/nov/homepagenews/CRUupdate
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
Yeah, Tim, and you could build a rocketship that could land on the moon, too. Those durn scientists think they're so smart, just because they read books and stuff. What do they know? Climate change can't be real because I want to drive a reely big shiny car reely fast.
3 years, 5 months ago
Climate change can be real, but it doesn't necessarily mean that we must tax the American people in order to manage the climate in the name of green science and big government if the hard data cannot support the scientific consensus. What is really at issue here is whether or not there has been a concerted effort on the part of the scientific community to deceive the public and discredit and marginalize dissent in order to promote a focused agenda worth billions of dollars to green energy interests. If the public is expected to support the green movement with their tax dollars, then the public has a right to know the truth behind the movement including the data that drives the scientific consensus. This is especially true during a global recession when many people are out of work. Cap and trade and a global warming summit should be way down the list of Washington priorities when Americans are out of work. If Obama is smart and in touch with the American people, he will realize that fact at once before his poll numbers render him totally ineffective.
Tim 3 years, 5 months ago
I'd love to build that rocket just for you, Norm!
I did not say climate had not changed, just that it always changes, it's normal.
It's not the science that's the problem it's the preconcieved ideas that interpret it.
3 years, 5 months ago
I wonder how much the temp has warmed over the last 10,000 years when there was a glacier just north of us? Hum???
3 years, 5 months ago
This certainly doesn't look good: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece
Tim 3 years, 5 months ago
Oh what a tangled web we weave....
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
"Climate change can be real, but it doesn't necessarily mean that we must tax the American people in order to manage the climate in the name of green science and big government if the hard data cannot support the scientific consensus. " . It would have to be the most massive conspiracy in the history of mankind to get the entire scientific community to fudge the data, as you suggest is happening. The odds against that happening are pretty astronomical. . "If the public is expected to support the green movement with their tax dollars," . Half a million dollars PER Soldier per year is the Pentagon's low-ball estimate for teh cost of the war in Afghanistan. . "then the public has a right to know the truth behind the movement including the data that drives the scientific consensus" . None of the data is hidden; I've seen the scientists on this board post many links that seem to go largely unclicked. If "the public" wants to know the truth, it's gonna have to read it.
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
"I did not say climate had not changed, just that it always changes, it's normal." . Try digging a hole with a shovel. Compare your rate of earth moving to that of a backhoe. Then look at some of the house-sized machines they use in industrial mining. Try cutting down a big tree with an ax. Compare your rate of timber production with that of a feller-buncher. How many billions of barrels of oil has mankind pumped from the earth in the last 50 years? We have transformed nearly every drop of that oil into smoke. What's new is the massive scale of mankind's ability to quickly cause incredibly massive changes to our environment. To think that the human transformation of the environment on such a massive scale doesn't or can't have equally massive side-effects is absurd.
3 years, 5 months ago
"Half a million dollars PER Soldier per year is the Pentagon's low-ball estimate for teh cost of the war in Afghanistan." From the guy who wants open boards so anyone and everyone can come in. Norm, if you dislike the way the US does things, move! Go back to live in Mexico where you found the citizens to be so much better than here in the US.
Rember when the scientists said red wine was bad for you - now it's good. Seems like the same thing with coffee and a bunch of other things. They look at a very small point in time and yell the sky is falling. After a more years of research, they change their minds. It just politically correct right now to say what they are saying. "We have transformed nearly every drop of that oil into smoke." Wrong again Norm!
3 years, 5 months ago
Would you trust this man? http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/nov/29/ipcc-climate-change-leaked-emails
Annsboy 3 years, 5 months ago
Back a few years ago it was said that a few degrees warmer would equal a net positive for global hunger due to more land available for farming. It is also interesting to note almost no hurricanes this year, weren't we told of massive storms to come? the sky is a falling.
Norm 3 years, 5 months ago
One year of few hurricanes is not statistically significant. It's like looking at a 10 minute time period in which Saddam Hussein didn't execute anybody and pronouncing him Gandhi.
3 years, 5 months ago
Sign in to comment