Tracy Warner: They love it when we’re angry
Originally published March 23, 2012 at 11:55 a.m., updated March 23, 2012 at 3:26 p.m.
You could sense the excitement. The political opportunity was enormous. Gasoline prices were rising, and quickly. So was public anger, which quite naturally would be directed against those who held political power. This would be advantageous to the opposition, even if they knew the price of gasoline was mostly outside government’s power to control. With the right persuasive techniques they could blame $2-a-gallon-gasoline on President George W. Bush, who was after all a genuine Texas oilman.
And so in 2004 Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry and his film crews headed out to the gas stations of America to imply that all oilmen, and their spiritual leader President Bush, should be boiled in their own product. “When gas hits $2 a gallon, we just don’t pay for it at the pump, we pay for it in our towns and our schools and our grocery stores,” Kerry said on the stump.
Well, yes. Kerry’s strategy may have worked, but not to the desired degree. Political strategists have memories, and it was not so long ago that gasoline prices were rising, rising beyond the unheard of plateau of $1 per gallon, which without a doubt helped make the last days of the Carter administration the last days of the Carter administration. Gasoline prices traditionally tend to spike in the spring with rise in demand, which dovetails nicely with the kickoff of the political season. With any luck public anxiety should peak by mid-July. The polls all show it. People who pump dollars into their tanks can get angry, and when they get angry they want somebody to blame. It all replayed in 2008 when we were gasping at the thought of $4 per gallon. Congress ran for their strategic reserves and launched the traditional search for bogeymen, conspirators and price gougers while ignoring that much of federal policy did not help the situation.
Now is the spring of our discontent. Gasoline is rising back up to $4 with fortuitous political timing and predictable reactions. Politicians watch polls. The polls show you are angry. A Fox News poll this week shows 12 percent of the public are “happy” about the price of gasoline, because it will promote alternate energy sources, and 31 percent of us suspect President Obama is happy, too. Meanwhile, 73 percent are seething.
No wonder the president took his Don’t Blame Me Tour to the oilfields this week. “When prices go up, it hurts everybody ... High gas prices are like a tax straight out of your paycheck,” said the president last month, revealing newfound empathy. Republicans of course are trying to lay the blame for insufficient domestic oil production on a president who has only been around three years.
Back at the world oil markets, the supply of crude continues to be poorly matched with rising world demand, leading to inevitable reactions, one of which is a rising price. Add the pent-up desires of the developing world with cyclical insanity in the Middle East and you get a price spike. The price of crude accounts for about 68 percent of the price of gasoline at the pump, say economists. With the world oil market one giant tank, any little dribbles American political policy might add won’t have much effect in the short term. Obama, for all his missteps, slathering subsidies, failed green energy initiatives and antipathy toward internal combustion, is off the hook. So too is George W. Bush, for that matter.
Meanwhile, Americans react to economic signals. High oil prices spur the desire to find more of it, which prompts innovation, which is increasing the domestic oil supply. Consumers, not being stupid, find ways to use less. They drive less and buy cars that use less. Eventually this might have an impact on the price. Whatever, politicians won’t have much to do with it.
Tracy Warner’s column appears Thursdays and Fridays. He can be reached at warner@wenatcheeworld.com or 665-1163.
» 8 comments on this story
MORE LIKE THIS
Unhappy public not sure who to blame for high gas
Gas prices, cars and odd policy
Slug of bad news backhands U.S. motorists
Advertisement
UPCOMING EVENTS
Tuesday, June 18
Toastmasters
Chelan County PUD Auditorium, 327 N. Wenatchee Ave., 7 a.m.
Tuesday, June 18
Alzheimer's Association Caregiver Support Group
Lake Chelan Community Hospital, 1:30 p.m.
Tuesday, June 18
Alzheimer's Association Caregiver Support Group
Lake Chelan Community Hospital, 1:30 p.m.
Tuesday, June 18
Memory Lane Coffee Hour
Mountain Meadows Assisited Living, 2:30 p.m.




Comments
Want to comment on this story? All Wenatchee World members are invited to comment on stories, by using the form below. Please know that we at wenatcheeworld.com hope our site is useful, entertaining and civil. So we'll delete comments that are obscene, abusive or way off topic. We appreciate it when readers use the "suggest removal" button to flag inappropriate comments. For more about interacting with the site, see our Use Policy.
joanne 1 year, 2 months ago
Yes, it is. We have to look both backwards and forwards in order to understand today. But we always like the easy way, which is to blame the person in power rather tnan look to history to show us what might be happening now.
menymeiner 1 year, 2 months ago
And how much in taxpayer subsidies do the oil companies get? Add it all together maybe we're getting to where the oil companies want. Like Europe, $8.80 a gallon.
JimboBear 1 year, 2 months ago
" Whatever, politicians won’t have much to do with it."
I really like that statement Tracy. I think it rings very true. The only thing they will accomplish is improvement of their jaw muscles and vocal chords.
trebor462 1 year, 2 months ago
George W. Bush will never be off the hook as far as the Liberals are concerned.
Larry71 1 year, 2 months ago
Neither will Clinton as far as right is concerned .
JimboBear 1 year, 2 months ago
I find myself sort of tip toeing the line between left and right, but to tell the truth, I didn't think much of either one of them.
Chuck 1 year, 2 months ago
Did anybody, in all of this vitriol, ever bother to think that maybe- just maybe- we should audit the Patent Office? or at least begin to question the sheer, and staggering, number of "Title 53" secrecy orders handed out these last couple of decades?
Whatever happened to the "cold fusion" we heard about in duplicated tests about a decade ago? It's biggest champion, Dr Eugene Mallove, is a few years gone, like so many people who believed, like Tesla, that there is easily harvested energy all around us.
Eugene Mallove
So let's see what's behind the curtain. What's potentially being witheld if you believe the likes of Dr Steven Greer (CSETI and the Disclosure Project) and the venerable Federation of American Scientists.
"Disclosure Project" website:
http://www.disclosureproject.org/
"Patent Secrecy Still Going Strong" from the FAS:
http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/10/invention_secrecy_2010.html
Here's one from MIT to tweak your understanding of conventional physics just a bit:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012-03/09/230-percent-efficient-leds
In all honesty, if we stick to accepted norms with regards to physics in general- and concepts of energy in particular- we can expect only the results we're getting--and we all know well where conventional thinking is getting us.
Clearly it's past time to bring the visionaries out of the closet, open all of the books, apologize to the people for decades of keeping it in the closet, and move forward for the benefit of all.
Sign in to comment