The Wenatchee World

Weather:

Weather

Five-day forecast

Remove this weather forecast

Overnight

Lo47° Slight Chc Showers

Thursday

Hi60° Rain Likely

Thursday Night

Lo41° Slight Chc Thunderstorms

Friday

Hi62° Breezy

Friday Night

Lo41° Partly Cloudy

Saturday

Hi67° Mostly Sunny

Saturday Night

Lo43° Slight Chc Showers

Sunday

Hi64° Mostly Sunny

Sunday Night

Lo46° Slight Chc Showers

Monday

Hi66° Slight Chc Showers

A case for containing Iran

Send to Kindle
Print This

Critics of the agreement with Iran concerning its nuclear program are right about most things but wrong about the most important things. They understand the agreement’s manifest and manifold defects and its probable futility. Crucial components of Iran’s nuclear infrastructure remain. U.S. concessions intended to cultivate the Iranian regime’s “moderates” are another version of the fatal conceit that U.S. policy can manipulate other societies. As is the hope that easing economic sanctions will create an Iranian constituency demanding nuclear retreat in exchange for yet more economic relief. Critics are, however, wrong in thinking that any agreement could control Iran’s nuclear aspirations. And what critics consider the agreement’s three worst consequences are actually benefits.

The six-month agreement, with ongoing negotiations, makes it impossible for the United States to attack its negotiating partner. Hence the agreement constrains Israel, which lacks the military capacity to be certain of a success commensurate with the risks of attacking Iran. Therefore there is no alternative to a policy of containment of a nuclear Iran.

View my optionsorSign in