4 free views left!
Print This

A plan whose time has not come

Friday, February 1, 2013

I am a firm believer in bicycle lanes. I truly appreciate efforts to design and build roadways to accommodate all their users, not just cars and trucks. I think encouraging bicycle transit and pedestrian safety makes Wenatchee a better city.

But ... there’s always a but when it comes to bicycles ... there comes a point where you can push too hard. The majority of the public, the drivers of automobiles, are never going to be delighted by the prospect of handing over precious pavement to cyclists. It’s a hard sell in the best conditions. Run hard against an antagonistic public and in the long run you could do the cause more harm than good. It’s the same old story — in a contest between a car and a bicycle, the bicycle loses.

Such is the case on North Wenatchee Avenue. The city is gearing up to rebuild The Avenue from Fifth Street to Miller. There will be real work on basic infrastructure, with upgrades to sewer lines and utilities, new curb ramps at intersections and crossings, better vehicle-detection sensors at signaled crossings, and on top nearly a mile of fresh new pavement. Not glamorous, but important.

Nobody seems bothered by that. What sets off the conversation is the where to put the stripes on top. It’s just paint on asphalt, but that decides where the rubber meets the road.

The planning engineers decided this might be the time to float an idea. Connect this short stretch of avenue with the eventual plans to extend the downtown traffic plan and feel. You could reduce the lanes for motor vehicles from two in each direction to one, with a center turn lane. That would make room for bicycle lanes, with on-street parking, while keeping the curbs and hardware as is. North Wenatchee Avenue would be two lanes, with a center turn, through downtown, all the way to Miller. From there north, it reverts to its great, wide congested glory.

At this point in the story steam begins to flow from many a motorist’s ears. Drivers, who think the center of Wenatchee has enough traffic nightmares as it is, don’t like the idea of yielding territory to bicycles. Business owners rightly fret over the potential loss of traffic, and the threat to their income.

Gary Owen, the city’s engineer taking the lead on the project, says that the two-lane plan could have advantages. It follows the goal to be “context sensitive” and consider all modes of transit. It connects with the plan for downtown and its eventual beautification. It improves safety — crossing two lanes is better than four, and this is a dangerous stretch, with four car-pedestrian accidents in five years. It fits with the bicycle network plan drafted by the regional bicycle advisory board, which sees North Wenatchee Avenue as a designated route.

In some ways it accommodates reality. That part of The Avenue was designed when it was a state highway, but it is no longer. Now it gets about 11,000 vehicles per day, which can be handled by two lanes. In contrast, Mission and Chelan get up to 20,000 vehicles per day. The Avenue north of Miller gets 35,000 to 40,000. Going from four lanes to two on this short stretch would slow traffic a little during rush hours, said Owen, but “It’s really not significant.”

Why is this a bad idea? Owen said public opinion “is very much negative.” The plan has gotten exposure at an open house, and in the media, and the majority reaction falls somewhere between please don’t and you’ve got to be kidding. Slow traffic for cyclists with the Loop Trail a block away? Hurt business, increase inconvenience, divert traffic — why?

Bicyclists offer supportive comments. The majority, vehemently, says no. “It’s pretty plainly clear the community is not interested,” said Owen.

The City Council and mayor will make the final decision. If they decide against two lanes in favor of four, they will be heeding public opinion, which is a big part of their job. And as a cyclist, I will lose a bicycle lane I probably wouldn’t use much, anyway. It may come in the future, when fewer people hate it. I would vote against this if I were them.

Losing a bicycle lane to avoid overwhelming public resentment is not a bad trade. It’s not worth it, and if it doesn’t happen Owen advises keeping it in perspective. “In the end, they are just stripes,” he said.

Tracy Warner’s column appears Thursdays and Fridays. He can be reached at warner@wenatcheeworld.com or 665-1163.

» Recommend this story.

» Know more about this story? Tell us.

» 10 comments on this story  

Comments

Want to comment on this story? All Wenatchee World members are invited to comment on stories, by using the form below. Please know that we at wenatcheeworld.com hope our site is useful, entertaining and civil. So we'll delete comments that are obscene, abusive or way off topic. We appreciate it when readers use the "suggest removal" button to flag inappropriate comments. For more about interacting with the site, see our Use Policy.

Magoo     3 months, 3 weeks ago

City engineer Gary Owen states that "in the end, they are just stripes". No, Mr. Owen, they are NOT just stripes.....they are what makes the traffic flow in an efficient manner. Let's hope he was just being flippant in his statement to the Wenatchee World.

2

JimboBear     3 months, 3 weeks ago

Once again, you have hit the nail on the head Mr. Warner. The title of your Op-Ed piece says it best, but your third from last sentence is frosting for the cake.

"Losing a bicycle lane to avoid overwhelming public resentment is not a bad trade."

Well said! I could only take issue with the "losing a bicycle lane" portion. That lane never existed as a set aside special lane. Bikes have always had the right to be there and they will maintain that right. There is nothing being lost if this plan is scrapped.

5

kyook     3 months, 3 weeks ago

Well said, Jimbo. I'm a bicyclist and I think this is a dumb plan with no real advantage to me and my wheeled companions.

1

lonedog3     3 months, 3 weeks ago

It is a plan without the support of the majority! Even the link spokesman left a comment speaking out against this insane plan! That in itself should speak volumes to the people. In a region still reeling from the financial loss from the the Town Toyota Center (which the majority didn't want) but we had it crammed down our throats lets see if this mayor crams a road project the majority doesn't want down our throats as well.

1

Don     3 months, 3 weeks ago

The only thing being debated is where the stripes get painted on the street. The money you repeatedly rant about is going to get spent no matter what to repair that section of the road and the utilities running beneath it.

0

kyook     3 months, 3 weeks ago

In reality, what's being debated is the way that stretch of street is used in the future and whether the proposed ideas are truly viable. Seriously, do we really need a .81 stretch of bike lanes to nowhere when there is a perfectly good bike path nearby? Do we really need on-street parking in front of the feed store, a few motels and some other businesses that already have their own parking lots? I don't know...some of it seems kinda hairbrained to me.

2

JSanford     3 months, 2 weeks ago

One of the best reasons to have bike lanes is to establish a visual framework that promotes more predictable behavior between cyclists and drivers. Drivers can expect bikes to stay within a certain section of the road, and vice versa.
It's also important to remember that bikes are a mode of transportation. Whether used for recreation, commuting, or fetching groceries, in terms of application they are similar to cars. Those of us who choose to use bikes in order to visit local businesses and spend money will use city streets. What this all comes down to is deciding the capacity in which we will all be sharing the road.

0

lonedog3     3 months, 2 weeks ago

the problem is that bicycle riders do not stay within the bicycle lands and use few if any traffic laws. They are not equipped with turn signals or brake lights.

0

kyook     3 months, 2 weeks ago

I was wondering when somebody was going to make this argument. Generalize much, lonedog? For every bike rider that you see violating traffic laws there are many more that don't. The problem is that the law abiding ones simply blend in. Car drivers do exactly the same things that you described, but they seem to get a pass.

I'll never forget the guy in the pick-up that rolled his window down and yelled at me for doing a slow (2-3 mph)roll (California stop) thru a stop sign when he had just done the same thing. Ahhh, the hypocrisy.

Currently, bikes are NOT required to have turn signals or brake lights. Would you have the government mandate those things? How about headlights, fenders, horns, bumpers airbags, seatbelts etc. etc. etc.?

0

Dudleydoright     3 months, 2 weeks ago

What we need to be doing is going back to four lanes through downtown not expanding this nonsense.

0

Sign in to comment


MORE LIKE THIS

Bike lane plan causes angst on The Avenue

Crowded byways make safety a two-way street for bicyclists, motorists

City plans to revamp intersection

City plan forbids Fifth Street parking next year

Bicycles have a right to be there


Advertisement


UPCOMING EVENTS

Friday, May 24

BNI Wenatchee Valley Friday
Smitty's Pancake House, 7 a.m.

Monday, May 27

Conquer Your Fear of Public Speaking - Toastmasters Meeting
First United Methodist Church, 5:30 p.m.

Tuesday, May 28

Toastmasters
Chelan County PUD Auditorium, 327 N. Wenatchee Ave., 7 a.m.

Tuesday, May 28

Alzheimer's Association Caregiver Support Group
Lake Chelan Community Hospital, 1:30 p.m.

Search events »

Submit your event »